4.3 Article

Routing Field Channels through a Tertiary Unit with Heterogeneous Fields

Journal

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001592

Keywords

Tertiary unit; Indus Basin Irrigation System; Warabandi; Linear programming; Gomal Zam Dam; Pakistan

Funding

  1. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) [72039118 IO 00003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extensive irrigation systems in South Asia consist of a hierarchy of canals delivering water to tertiary units, with a network of field channels managed by farmers/farmer associations. This paper develops a mathematical model/algorithm to optimize construction costs by routing field channels along existing field boundaries. The model was applied to the Gomal Zam Irrigation System in Pakistan, resulting in a 20% reduction in total length compared to expert judgment.
The extensive irrigation systems of South Asia are predominately a hierarchy of canals delivering water to a tertiary unit. A network of field channels transfers water within the tertiary unit to the field where it is applied using surface irrigation. The network of field channels within a tertiary unit is often left to the farmers/farmer associations to construct, maintain, and operate. This paper develops a mathematical model/algorithm for routing the field channel along the existing field boundaries such that every field is serviced by a field channel and minimizing the total length of the field channel as a proxy measure of the cost of construction of field channels. The models developed in this paper are formulated as integer programs, implemented in a general-purpose solver. The model is applied to a tertiary unit of the Gomal Zam Irrigation System in Pakistan and shows that for this particular application, the optimized total length of field channels is 9,463 m compared with 11,313 m when an expert judgment is used, a reduction of 1,850 m (20%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available