4.4 Article

User experience evaluation method based on online product reviews

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 1791-1805

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-210564

Keywords

User experience (UX) evaluation; Online product reviews; Opinion mining; UX aspect; Product design

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1104205]
  2. 111 Project [B13044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores how to evaluate product UX through online product reviews, proposing a systematic method of product UX evaluation based on key elements extraction, integration, and quantitative evaluation. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated through a case study on reviews of a wireless vacuum cleaner, providing designers with objective evaluation and detailed suggestions for product improvement.
Evaluating the quality of the user experience (UX) of existing products is important for new product development. Conventional UX evaluation methods, such as questionnaire, have the disadvantages of the great subjective influence of investigators and limited number of participants. Meanwhile, online product reviews on e-commerce platforms express user evaluations of product UX. Because the reviews objectively reflect the user opinions and contain a large amount of data, they have potential as an information source for UX evaluation. In this context, this study explores how to evaluate product UX through using online product reviews. A pilot study is conducted to define the key elements of a review. Then, a systematic method of product UX evaluation based on reviews is proposed. The method includes three parts: extraction of key elements, integration of key elements, and quantitative evaluation based on rough number. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by a case study using reviews of a wireless vacuum cleaner. Based on the proposed method, designers can objectively evaluate the UX quality of existing products and obtain detailed suggestions for product improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available