4.7 Article

Chlamydia trachomatis, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 224, Issue -, Pages S121-S127

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiab017

Keywords

Chlamydia trachomatis; pelvic inflammatory disease; epithelial ovarian cancer

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The link between Chlamydia trachomatis, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) may be relatively weak, but biologically plausible, requiring further investigation in future studies.
Epidemiologic, clinical, molecular and translational research findings support an interrelationship between Chlamydia trachomatis, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Overall, the link between C. trachomatis, PID, and EOC seems to be relatively weak, although nondifferential misclassification bias may have attenuated the results. The predominant tubal origin of EOC and the role of chronic inflammation in tumorigenesis suggest that the association is biologically plausible. Thus, C. trachomatis and PID may represent potential risk factors or risk markers for EOC. However, many steps in this chain of events are still poorly understood and need to be addressed in future studies. Research gaps include time of exposure in relation to the long-term consequences and lag time to EOC. Data of differential risk for EOC between chlamydial and nonchlamydial PID is also needed. Another major research gap has been the absence of high-performance biomarkers for C. trachomatis, PID, and EOC, as well as EOC precursors. Biomarkers for C. trachomatis and PID leading to increased risk of EOC should be developed. If the association is confirmed, C. trachomatis and PID prevention efforts may play a role in reducing the burden of EOC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available