4.7 Review

Evidence for Human-to-Human Transmission of Hantavirus: A Systematic Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 226, Issue 8, Pages 1362-1371

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiab461

Keywords

hantavirus; hantavirus pulmonary syndrome; infectious disease transmission; hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome; healthcare-associated infections; outbreak; systematic review

Funding

  1. PAHO through the cooperative grant Building Capacity and Networks to Address Emerging Infectious Diseases in the Americas, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [NU50CK000494]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The balance of evidence does not support the claim of human-to-human transmission of hantavirus infection. Further research, including well-designed cohort and case-control studies, is needed to provide more accurate information and inform public health recommendations.
The balance of the evidence does not support the claim that human-to-human transmission of hantavirus infection occurs. Well-designed cohort and case-control studies that control for co-exposure to rodents are needed to inform public health recommendations. Background Hantavirus is known to be transmitted from rodents to humans. However, some reports from Argentina and Chile have claimed that the hantavirus strain Andes virus (ANDV) can cause human-to-human transmission of the disease. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the evidence for human-to-human transmission of hantavirus. Methods We searched PubMed (inception to 28 February 2021), Cochrane Central, Embase, LILACS and SciELO (inception to 3 July 2020), and other sources. We included studies that assessed whether interpersonal contact with a person with laboratory-confirmed hantavirus infection led to human-to-human transmission. Two reviewers conducted screening, selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Results Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity. With the exception of 1 prospective cohort study of ANDV in Chile with serious risk of bias, evidence from comparative studies (strongest level of evidence available) does not support human-to-human transmission of hantavirus infection. Noncomparative studies with a critical risk of bias suggest that human-to-human transmission of ANDV may be possible. Conclusions The balance of the evidence does not support the claim of human-to-human transmission of ANDV. Well-designed cohort and case-control studies that control for co-exposure to rodents are needed to inform public health recommendations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available