4.7 Article

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Generates Greater Immunoglobulin G Levels in Women Compared to Men

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 224, Issue 5, Pages 793-797

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiab314

Keywords

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; serological testing; IgG; ELISA; dried blood spots; vaccine; neutralizing; receptor binding domain

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [2035114]
  2. National Institutes of Health [3UL1TR001422-06S4]
  3. Northwestern University Office of Research
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [2035114] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a community cohort without prior COVID-19 infection, women showed a stronger antibody response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination compared to men, especially after the first dose. After two doses, women continued to have significantly higher antibody levels than men, although the virus neutralization rate was similar. Sex-specific antibody responses to mRNA vaccination provide insights into vaccine protection and side effects.
We investigated whether the antibody response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination is similar in women and men. In a community cohort without prior COVID-19, first vaccine dose produced higher immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels and percent inhibition of spike-ACE2 receptor binding, a surrogate measure of virus neutralization, in women compared to men (7.0 mu g/mL, 51.6% vs 3.3 mu g/mL, 36.4%). After 2 doses, IgG levels remained significantly higher for women (30.4 mu g/mL) compared to men (20.6 mu g/mL), while percent inhibition was similar (98.4% vs 97.7%). Sex-specific antibody response to mRNA vaccination informs future efforts to understand vaccine protection and side effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available