4.5 Review

Exercise blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 39, Issue 12, Pages 2395-2402

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002962

Keywords

cardiopulmonary; exercise physiology; exercise test; haemodynamic; hypertension

Funding

  1. Broadreach Elite PhD Research Scholarship
  2. National Heart Foundation of Australia Postdoctoral Fellowship [102484]
  3. National Heart Foundation of Australia Future Leader Fellowship [102553]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that exercise systolic blood pressure is associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, and individuals with a hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) exhibit worse cardiovascular risk factors compared to those with no-HRE. This relationship is consistent across different study populations.
Background: A hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) is associated with cardiovascular disease and high blood pressure (BP). A poor cardiovascular risk factor profile may underlie these associations, although this has not been systematically elucidated. Via systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the relationship between exercise BP and cardiovascular risk factors, and determine if cardiovascular risk is higher in those with an HRE vs. no-HRE across different study populations (including those with/without high BP at rest). Methods: Three online databases were searched for cross-sectional studies reporting data on exercise BP, an HRE and cardiovascular risk factors (including arterial structure, lipid, metabolic, inflammatory and kidney function markers). Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were used to calculate pooled correlations between exercise BP and each risk factor and pooled mean differences between those with/without an HRE. Results: Thirty-eight studies (38 295 participants, aged 50 +/- 3years; 78% male) were included. Exercise SBP was associated with arterial, lipid and kidney function risk markers (P < 0.05). Those with an HRE had greater aortic stiffness (+0.80 +/- 0.35 m/s), total (+0.14 +/- 0.03 mmol/l) and low-density lipoprotein (+0.12 +/- 0.03 mmol/l) cholesterol, triglycerides (+0.24 +/- 0.04 mmol/l), glucose (+0.15 +/- 0.05 mmol/l), white blood cell count (+0.49 +/- 0.16 mmol/l) and albumin-to-creatinine ratio (standardized mean difference: +0.97 +/- 0.34), and lower flow-mediated dilation (-4.13 +/- 1.02%) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.04 +/- 0.01 mmol/l) vs. those with no-HRE (P < 0.05 all). Results were broadly similar across study populations. Conclusion: Exercise SBP is associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, which appear worse in those with an HRE vs. no-HRE. As results were similar across population groups, an HRE should be considered an important indicator of cardiovascular risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available