4.2 Review

Hypertension in China: burdens, guidelines and policy responses: a state-of-the-art review

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 126-134

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41371-021-00570-z

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The review provides an assessment of the disease burden, management policies, and guidelines for hypertension in China. It found a larger burden of hypertension in men with low awareness, treatment, and control rates in both sexes. Chinese hypertension guidelines offer evidence-based instructions, while policy documents set national goals for hypertension management.
Hypertension is a leading risk factor of cardiovascular disease and it is becoming increasingly prevalent globally. Correspondingly, the Chinese government and public health institutions have issued a series of policy documents and guidelines for hypertension. However, no comprehensive review of such documents has been conducted. Hence, this review aims to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive assessment of not only the disease burden, but also hypertension management policies and guidelines in China. A total of 15 epidemiological studies based on national population surveys, 15 Chinese Hypertension Guidelines, and seven policy documents were identified. We found a larger burden of hypertension in men, while the awareness, treatment, and control rates have remained low in both sexes. The ranges of hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rate among hypertensive patients were 18.0-44.7%, 23.6-56.2%, 14.2-48.5%, and 4.2-30.1% respectively. Chinese hypertension guidelines provide evidence-based instructions to healthcare practitioners over hypertension management in which primary healthcare is increasingly emphasized. Finally, the policy documents set national goals for hypertension management and standardized the services provided in primary healthcare. The findings highlight the importance of integrating new guidelines into hypertension management provided by primary healthcare practitioners and the need to evaluate the implementation of guidelines and policies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available