4.8 Article

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to treat acute-on- chronic liver failure: A multicenter randomized trial (GRAFT study)

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 6, Pages 1346-1354

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.033

Keywords

cirrhosis; inflammation; regeneration; stem cell mobilization; ACLF; transplantation; organ failure

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [EN 1100/1-1, SCHM2661/3-1, SCHM2661/3-2, SFB TRR57]
  2. Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin
  3. Berlin Institute of Health
  4. European Union [668031, 825694]
  5. Societal Challenges-Health, Demographic Change and Wellbeing [731875]
  6. Cellex Foundation (PREDICT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this multicenter controlled trial, G-CSF did not show significant beneficial effects on ACLF patients compared to standard medical therapy alone. The study was terminated prematurely due to futility after analysis. Therefore, G-CSF should not be recommended as a standard treatment for ACLF.
Background & Aims: Based on positive results from small single center studies, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is being widely used for the treatment of patients with acute-on chronic liver failure (ACLF). Herein, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of G-CSF in patients with ACLF. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, controlled, open-label phase II study, 176 patients with ACLF (EASL-CLIF criteria) were randomized to receive G-CSF (5 mu g/kg daily for the first 5 days and every third day thereafter until day 26) plus standard medical therapy (SMT) (n = 88) or SMT alone. The primary effi- cacy endpoint was 90-day transplant-free survival analyzed by Cox regression modeling. The key secondary endpoints were overall and transplant-free survival after 360 days, the development of ACLF-related complications, and the course of liver function scores during the entire observation period. Results: Patients treated with G-CSF had a 90-day transplant free survival rate of 34.1% compared to 37.5% in the SMT group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% CI 0.711-1.551; p = 0.805). Transplant-free and overall survival at 360 days did not differ between the 2 arms (HR 0.998; 95% CI 0.697-1.430; p = 0.992 and HR 1.058; 95% CI 0.727-1.548; p = 0.768, respectively). G-CSF did not improve liver function scores, the occurrence of infections, or survival in subgroups of patients without infections, with alcohol-related ACLF, or with ACLF defined by the APASL criteria. Sixty-one serious adverse events were reported in the GCSF+SMT group and 57 were reported in the SMT group. In total, 7 drug-related serious adverse reactions occurred in the G-CSF group. The study was prematurely terminated due to futility after conditional power calculation. Conclusions: In contrast to previous findings, G-CSF had no significant beneficial effect on patients with ACLF in this multicenter controlled trial, which suggests that it should not be used as a standard treatment for ACLF. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02669680 Lay summary: Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was considered as a novel treatment for acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). We performed the first randomized, multicenter, controlled phase II trial, which showed that G-CSF did not improve survival or other clinical endpoints in patients with ACLF. Therefore, G-CSF should not be used to treat liver disease outside clinical studies. (C) 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available