4.5 Article

Cerebral vasoreactivity in HeartMate 3 patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 40, Issue 8, Pages 786-793

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.05.005

Keywords

LVAD; HM3; pulsatility; cerebral autoregulation; heart failure

Funding

  1. European Union [705219]
  2. Lisa and Mark Schwartz Program to Reverse Heart Failure at New York -Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [705219] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared cerebrovascular metabolic reactivity in patients with HM3 and HMII CF-LVADs, finding significantly improved CVR in HM3 patients, but remained lower than healthy controls. While CF-LVAD therapy has an impact on cerebral hemodynamics, it does not completely reverse the changes.
BACKGROUND: While rates of stroke have declined with the HeartMate3 (HM3) continuous-flow (CF) left ventricular assist device (LVAD), the impact of non-pulsatile flow and artificial pulse physiology on cerebrovascular function is not known. We hypothesized that improved hemodynamics and artificial pulse physiology of HM3 patients would augment cerebrovascular metabolic reactivity (CVR) compared with HeartMate II (HMII) CF-LVAD and heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS: Mean, peak systolic and diastolic flow velocities (MFV, PSV, MinFV, respectively) and cerebral pulsatility index were determined in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) before and after a 30 sec breath-hold challenge in 90 participants: 24 healthy controls; 30 HF, 15 HMII, and 21 HM3 patients. RESULTS: In HM3 patients, breath-holding increased MFV (Delta 8 +/- 10 cm/sec, p < .0001 vs baseline) to levels similar to HF patients (Delta 9 +/- 8 cm/sec, p > .05), higher than HMII patients (Delta 2 +/- 8 cm/sec, p < .01) but lower than healthy controls (Delta 13 +/- 7 cm/sec, p < .05). CF-LVAD altered the proportion of systolic and diastolic flow responses as reflected by a differential cerebral pulsatility index (p = .03). Baseline MFV was not related to CVR (r(2) = 0.0008, p = .81). However, CF-LVAD pump speed was strongly inversely associated with CVR in HM II (r(2) = 0.51, p = .003) but not HM3 patients (r(2) = 0.01, p = .65). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with HMII, HM3 patients have a significantly improved CVR. However, CVR remains lower in HM3 and HF patients than in healthy controls, therefore suggesting that changes in cerebral hemodynamics are not reversed by CF-LVAD therapy. Further research on the mechanisms and the long-term impact of altered cerebral hemodynamics in this unique patient population are warranted.(C) 2021 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available