4.7 Article

Identification and growth dynamics of meat spoilage microorganisms in modified atmosphere packaged poultry meat by MALDI-TOF MS

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 84-91

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.07.003

Keywords

Meat spoilage; Modified atmosphere; Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight; Brochothrix thermosphacta; Carnobacterium sp.

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy via the German Federation of Industrial Research Associations (AiF)
  2. Industry Association for Food Technology and Packaging (IVLV) [AiF 17803 N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) is widely used in food industry to extend the microbiological shelf-life of meat. Typically, poultry meat has been packaged in a CO2/N-2 atmosphere (with residual low O-2). Recently, some producers use high O-2 MAP for poultry meat to empirically reach comparable shelf lifes. In this work, we compared spoilage microbiota of skinless chicken breast in high (80% O-2, 20% CO2) and low O-2 MAP (65% N-2 and 35% CO2). Two batches of meat were incubated in each atmosphere for 14 days at 4 degrees C and 10 degrees C. Atmospheric composition of each pack and colony forming units (25 degrees C, 48 h, BHI agar) of poultry samples were determined at seven timepoints. Identification of spoilage organisms was carried out by MALDI-TOF MS. Brochothrix thermosphacta, Carnobacterium sp. and Pseudomonas sp. were the main organisms found after eight days at 4 degrees C and 10 degrees C in high O-2 MAP. In low O-2 MAP, the main spoilage microbiota was represented by species Hafnia alvei at 10 degrees C, and genera Carnobacterium sp., Serratia sp., and Yersinia sp. at 4 degrees C. High O-2 MAP is suggested as preferential gas because were less detrimental and pathogens like Yersinia were not observed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available