Journal
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 414, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125507
Keywords
Ordered mesoporous carbon; Zerovalent iron; Electron transfer; Cr(VI) and As(V)
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [41977117, 41771349, 41977085]
- Qing-Lan Project of Yangzhou University
- High-level Talent Support Plan of Yangzhou University
- Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province [2019C02053]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this study, ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC) and Zerovalent iron (ZVI) impregnated OMC were fabricated for simultaneous removal of arsenate (As(V)) and chromate (Cr(VI)). OMC exhibited sorption capacities of 0.66 mmol g-1 for Cr(VI) and 0.019 mmol g-1 for As(V) at pH 3, while ZVI/OMC showed capacities of 0.71 mmol g-1 for Cr(VI) and 0.39 mmol g-1 for As(V). The removal mechanism was predominantly reduction (over 55%), followed by complexation and precipitation.
It is challenging to efficiently remove arsenate (As(V)) and chromate (Cr(VI)) simultaneously. Herein, ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC) was fabricated with averaged pore diameter of 6.5 nm and surface area of 997 m2 g- 1. Zerovalent iron (ZVI) impregnation reduced surface area of ZVI/OMC (432 m2 g- 1) and increased ID/IG ratio by 13%. Maximal Cr(VI) and As(V) sorption capacities at pH 3 were 0.66 and 0.019 mmol g-1 by OMC, and 0.71 and 0.39 mmol g-1 by ZVI/OMC, respectively. Reduction accounted for over 55% for Cr(VI) and As(V) removal followed by complexation and precipitation. Better ZVI/OMC performance was ascribed to higher electron transfer rate and lower electrical resistance than OMC as per electrochemical analysis. Upon Cr(VI) introduction, As(V) removal increased to 0.28 mmol g-1 by OMC, but decreased to 0.16 mmol g-1 by ZVI/OMC. OMC could preferably reduce CrO42- to Cr3+ by hydroxyl group, which enhanced its zeta potential facilitating As(V) sorption. Regarding ZVI/OMC, Fe0 and Fe oxide in ZVI/OMC exhibited better affinity to As(V), but the competition for the similar active sites resulted in compromised As(V) and Cr(VI) removal. Thus, the novel OMC is advantageous for removal of binary As(V) and Cr(VI), but ZVI/OMC is robust to detoxify single heavy metal.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available