4.4 Article

Surface ablation and its drivers along a west-east transect of the Southern Patagonia Icefield

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 268, Pages 305-318

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2021.92

Keywords

Energy balance; glacier modelling; melt-surface

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID) Programa Becas de Doctorado en el Extranjero, Beca Chile for the doctoral scholarship
  2. FONDECYT [1171832]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on the Southern Patagonia Icefield suggests that glacial ablation is influenced by energy balance, with significant differences in climatic conditions and energy fluxes between the western and eastern parts of the icefield.
Glaciers in the Southern Patagonia Icefield (SPI) have been shrinking in recent decades, but due to a lack of field observations, understanding of the drivers of ablation is limited. We present a distributed surface energy balance model, forced with meteorological observations from a west-east transect located in the north of the SPI. Between October 2015 and June 2016, humid and warm on-glacier conditions prevailed on the western side compared to dry and cold conditions on the eastern side. Controls of ablation differ along the transect, although at glacier-wide scale sensible heat (mean of 72 W m(-2) to the west and 51 W m(-2) to the east) and net shortwave radiation (mean of 54 W m(-2) to the west and 52 W m(-2) to the east) provided the main energy sources. Net longwave radiation was an energy sink, while latent heat was the most spatially variable flux, being an energy sink in the east (-4 W m(-2)) and a source in the west (20 W m(-2)). Ablation was high, but at comparable elevations, it was greater to the west. These results provide new insights into the spatial variability of energy-balance fluxes and their control over the ablation of Patagonian glaciers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available