4.6 Article

Do Urine Drug Tests Reveal Substance Misuse Among Patients Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Pain?

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 2365-2372

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07095-8

Keywords

urine drug tests; opioid analgesics; chronic pain

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse [K23DA042168]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that 37% of patients receiving opioids for chronic pain may have clinical concerns regarding substance misuse based on expert adjudication of UDT results, with an additional 35% having uncertain results. The study also identified reasons for concerning UDT results, such as non-detection of prescribed substances or detection of non-prescribed substances.
Background Urine drug testing (UDT) is a recommended risk mitigation strategy for patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain, but evidence that UDT supports identification of substance misuse is limited. Objective Identify the prevalence of UDT results that may identify substance misuse, including diversion, among patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain. Design Retrospective cohort study. Subjects Patients (n=638) receiving opioids for chronic pain who had one or more UDTs, examining up to eight substances per sample, during a one 1-year period. Main Measures Experts adjudicated the clinical concern that UDT results suggest substance misuse or diversion as not concerning, uncertain, or concerning. Key Results Of 638 patients, 48% were female and 49% were over age 55 years. Patients had a median of three UDTs during the intervention year. We identified 37% of patients (235/638) with >= 1 concerning UDT and a further 35% (222/638) having >= 1 uncertain UDT. We found concerning UDTs due to non-detection of a prescribed substance in 24% (156/638) of patients and detection of a non-prescribed substance in 23% (147/638). Compared to patients over 65 years, those aged 18-34 years were more likely to have concerning UDT results with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-12.5). Patients with mental health diagnoses (AOR 1.6 [95% CI 1.1-2.3]) and substance use diagnoses (AOR 2.3 [95% CI 1.5-3.7]) were more likely to have a concerning UDT result. Conclusions Expert adjudication of UDT results identified clinical concern for substance misuse in 37% of patients receiving opioids for chronic pain. Further research is needed to determine if UDTs impact clinical practice or patient-related outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available