4.5 Article

Effect of cashew nut protein concentrate substitution on the physicochemical properties, antioxidant activity and consumer acceptability of wheat bread

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages 2200-2208

Publisher

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-021-05233-y

Keywords

Cashew nut protein concentrate; Physicochemical; Sensory properties; Antioxidant activity; Bread

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that incorporating up to 15% cashew nut protein concentrate in bread can increase its nutritional value and antioxidant activity. Substitution with CNPC increased protein and micronutrient content, while decreasing carbohydrate content. However, the substitution also resulted in a decrease in specific volume.
The effect of incorporating different proportions (5, 10, 15 and 20%) of cashew nut protein concentrate (CNPC) on the physicochemical properties, antioxidant activity and consumer acceptability of bread was investigated. Substitution of wheat flour with CNPC increased the water and oil absorption capacity, swelling capacity, peak and final viscosities. Substitution of CNPC in wheat bread significantly increased the protein (12.69-22.04 g/100 g), ash, crude fiber, calcium, magnesium, iron (2.09-3.36 mg/100 g), phosphorus and zinc (0.79-1.57 mg/100 g) content, while carbohydrate value decreased. Substitution of wheat flour with CNPC in bread increased the loaf weight while specific volume decreased (4.36-2.21 cm(3)/g). Acceptable bread was prepared with up to 15% CNPC; which contained the highest total phenolics (2.64 mg GAE/g), DPPH radical scavenging activity (71.22 mu mol TE/100 g), ferric reducing antioxidant power (427.77 mu mol TE/100 g) and ABTS radical scavenging activity (195.68 mu mol TE/100 g) than the 100% wheat bread (1.28 mg GAE/g, 40.81 mu mol TE/100 g, 375.62 mu mol TE/100 g and 154.02 mu mol TE/100 g).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available