4.5 Article

Comparison of calcium and ultrasonic treatment on fruit firmness, pectin composition and cell wall-related enzymes of postharvest apricot during storage

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 1588-1597

Publisher

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-021-05170-w

Keywords

Apricot; Ultrasonic; Calcium; Pectin; Storage

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Nonprofit Research Institution of CAF Project [CAFYBB2017ZA004-4]
  2. Key Scientific Research in Henan Colleges and University [20A550011]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Non-profit Research Institution of CAF [CAFYBB2018GB001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that after calcium and ultrasonic treatment, the firmness of apricot fruit increased while juice yield and water-soluble pectin content decreased. Both treatments effectively reduced the activity of certain enzymes. Calcium treatment was more effective than ultrasonic treatment in delaying postharvest softening of apricot fruit.
This study was conducted to examine the effects of calcium treatment (2%, 20 min) and ultrasonic treatment (400 W, 20 min) on postharvest apricot fruit during storage. The results showed that after calcium and ultrasonic treatment, compared with the control, the firmness of apricot fruit increased by 41.53% and 3.83% at 16 d, but juice yield and water-soluble pectin (WSP) content decreased by 8.26% and 3.55%, 28.57% and 4.08%, respectively. Both calcium and ultrasonic treatment were more effective in reducing polygalacturonase (PG), beta-Galactosidase (beta-Gal), pectin methylesterase (PME), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) activity. Moreover, fruit firmness was significantly negatively correlated with juice yield, WSP and PPO, and positively correlated with PG and beta-Gal, PPO and POD. In contrast, calcium treatment was more effective than ultrasonic treatment in delaying postharvest softening of apricot.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available