4.6 Article

Influence of infant cereal formulation on phenolic compounds and formation of Maillard reaction products

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104187

Keywords

Infant cereals; Free and bound phenolic compounds; Maillard reaction indicators; Furan; Acrylamide; Furan and acrylamide exposure

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [RYC-2015-18795]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the formulation of infant cereals can influence the Maillard reaction products and the composition of free and bound phenols. Levels of furan and acrylamide were lowest in rice infant cereals.
Infant cereals (IC) are normally the first food provided when the complementary feed period starts. Various IC formulations are available, containing different types and compositions of cereals and other ingredients. The aim of our study is to determine the influence of IC formulation on Maillard reaction products, including furan and acrylamide. The composition of free and bound phenols was also obtained. The furan content detected ranged from 10.3 to 19.5 mu g kg-1, and that of acrylamide from inappreciable to 92.4 mu g kg-1, with a mean value of 70.5 mu g kg- 1; for both compounds, the lowest values were obtained for rice IC. Levels of furosine, glucosylisomaltol and acrylamide were mainly influenced by the cereal composition, while those of furan and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) were influenced both by cereal composition and by other ingredients. Phenolic composition was strongly influenced by the additional ingredients in the formulation; the largest fraction was that of free phenols. Taking into account the furan and acrylamide exposure, no risk for furan intake was observed; however, significant amounts of acrylamide are ingested when IC with gluten are used.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available