4.7 Article

A turbulence dissipation inhomogeneity scaling in the wake of two side-by-side square prisms

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 924, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.599

Keywords

turbulence theory; wakes

Funding

  1. J.C.V.'s Chair of Excellence CoPreFlo - I-SITE-ULNE [R-TALENT-19-001-VASSILICOS, CONVENTION_219_ESR_06]
  2. Region Hauts de France [20003862]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study experimentally investigated the scaling of turbulent energy dissipation rate in the cross-stream direction of turbulent wake flows generated by two side-by-side square prisms. The results showed that the normalised turbulence dissipation coefficient for residual incoherent turbulence scaled similarly along the cross-stream direction after removal of large-scale coherent structures.
We experimentally study how the turbulent energy dissipation rate scales in the cross-stream direction of turbulent wake flows generated by two side-by-side square prisms. We consider three different such turbulent flows with gap ratios G/H = 1.25, 2.4 and 3.5, where G is the distance between the prisms and H is the prism width. These three flows have a very different dynamics, inhomogeneities and large-scale features. The measurements were taken with a multi-camera particle image velocimetry system at several streamwise locations between 2.5H and 20H downstream of the prisms. After removing the large-scale most energetic coherent structures, the normalised turbulence dissipation coefficient C'(epsilon) of the remaining incoherent turbulence is found to scale as C'(epsilon) similar to (root Re-L/Re'(lambda))(3/2) along the highly inhomogeneous cross-stream direction for all streamwise locations tested in all three flows and for all three inlet Reynolds numbers considered; Re'(lambda) and Re-L are, respectively, a Taylor length-based and an integral length-based Reynolds number of the remaining incoherent turbulence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available