4.2 Article

24 hour polymerization shrinkage of resin composite core materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 775-785

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12788

Keywords

CAD; CAM; polymerization shrinkage; resin composite; resin core material

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the 24-hour polymerization shrinkage of resin composite core materials. Results showed a wide volumetric shrinkage range, inconsistent shrinkage behavior, and all materials reaching maximum values before 24 hours. No significant difference was observed during proposed digital same day all ceramic crown procedures, but some differences were noted at 24 hours.
Purpose The study's purpose was to evaluate the 24-hour polymerization shrinkage of resin composite core materials. Material and methods Eleven resin composite core material samples (n = 12) were evaluated using a non-contact imaging device with measurements obtained over 24 h. Shrinkage values were determined corresponding to proposed times involved with CAD/CAM same-day treatment and at 24 h. Shrinkage data was statistically compared using Friedman/Dunn's test for intragroup analysis and Kruskal Wallis/Dunn's test for intergroup analysis, all at a 95% level of confidence (alpha = 0.05). Results Mean results identified a wide volumetric shrinkage range with considerable similarity overlap. Inconsistent shrinkage behavior was evident and all materials reached maximum values before 24 h. No significant difference was observed during proposed digital same day all ceramic crown procedures, but some differences were noted at 24 h. Conclusions Under this study's conditions results were material specific, at times inconsistent, with wide variation. Shrinkage consistently increased for all products and it is not known if the continued shrinkage magnitude may compromise the stability and fit of all-ceramic crowns at 24 h.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available