4.7 Article

The feasibility of solar-powered small-scale brackish water desalination units in a coastal aquifer prone to saltwater intrusion: A comparison between electrodialysis reversal and reverse osmosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 290, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112604

Keywords

Brackish water; Electrodialysis reversal; Reverse osmosis; PV-Powered desalination; Cost analysis; Environmental cost

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the feasibility of using photovoltaic powered small-scale brackish water desalination units in a coastal aquifer with saltwater intrusion and water shortages. The study finds that EDR-PV is more economically viable and environmentally friendly compared to RO-PV when considering internalized environmental costs. EDR-PV is more cost-effective until the salinity of the aquifer exceeds 5000 ppm.
In the face of increasing water shortages worldwide, water desalination has the potential to expand the available freshwater supply options in many water stressed regions. This paper assesses the feasibility of adopting photovoltaic powered small-scale brackish water desalination units in a coastal aquifer facing saltwater intrusion and chronic water shortages. Moreover, a detailed cost comparison, which incorporates the associated environmental costs, is conducted between the Electrodialysis Reversal (EDR) technique and Reverse Osmosis (RO). The results showed that PV-powered small-scale desalination units were more economically viable as compared to grid-powered units, when the electricity tariffs reflected non-subsidized electricity prices and environmental costs were internalized. EDR-PV proved to be more economically feasible and with a lower environmental footprint as compared to RO-PV, up until the salinity of the aquifer was below 5000 ppm (EDR: 0.57-1.18 $/m3; RO = 1.19-1.59 $/m3). Beyond that salinity, the RO-PV was found to be the more economically viable option, with costs reaching as high as 2.65 $/m3 at a salinity of 25,000 ppm. Overall, the environmental costs between the two technologies varied significantly, largely due to differences in the generated brine volume, with EDR having better efficiencies at lower salinity levels. Finally, the study highlighted the risk of accelerating saltwater intrusion as a result of the increased market penetration of solar-powered desalination units along vulnerable coastal aquifers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available