4.3 Article

Incineration of Pulp and Paper Mill Waste in Supercritical Water Using Methane as a Co-Fuel

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING THERMOPHYSICS
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 350-364

Publisher

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1810232821030024

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [18-19-00165]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the oxidation treatment of toxic waste from pulp and paper mills in supercritical water-oxygen fluid, with the addition of methane as a co-fuel. The results suggest that distributed supply of methane is more effective in reducing the oxygen excess required for complete oxidation of organic components in the waste compared to localized methane inlet.
The paper presents a research on the disposal of the toxic waste of pulp and paper mill (sludge-lignin with the empirical formula CH(1.51)N(0.05)S(0.03)Cl(0.01)O(0.54)through its oxidation in supercritical water-oxygen fluid, including the case of using methane as a co-fuel. The experiments were carried out with a flow reactor of original design at a pressure of 25 MPa, temperature gradient along the vertical axis (from top to bottom: 390-600 degrees C), and variation in the flow rate of the sludge-lignin (with the addition of NaOH, 1.6 wt %), oxygen, and methane. The experiments yielded data on the content of phenols in the water and the composition of the gaseous products collected at the outlet of the reactor versus the oxygen excess ratio. From these data, as well as the time dependences of the reactor wall temperature and the power of the ohmic heaters, it follows that using distributed supply of methane to compensate for the energy for heating of the reagents is preferable as compared with local inlet of methane to the upper part of the reactor. It has been shown that the addition of methane makes it possible to reduce the oxygen excess required for complete oxidation of the organic components of sludge-lignin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available