4.5 Article

Cyclic Testing of Earthquake-resilient Steel Joints with a Replaceable Buckling-restrained Link

Journal

JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages 6676-6702

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2021.1927902

Keywords

Cyclic test; earthquake-resilient; steel joints; replaceable buckling-restrained link; seismic performance

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630706]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708166]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of China [JZ2019HGTB0086]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a novel earthquake-resilient steel joint with a replaceable buckling-restrained link (RBRL) and validates its performance through experiments and modeling. The results show that the RBRL can achieve the expected performance, while joints with welded web connections are prone to welding tear failures, and the connecting plate thickness and stiffeners have minimal impact on performance.
This paper proposes a novel earthquake-resilient steel joint with a replaceable buckling-restrained link (RBRL). To study its seismic behavior and post-earthquake resilience performance, five full-scale specimens are tested under cyclic loads, during which three parameters are investigated: the web connection type, the connecting plate thickness and the core plate stiffeners. The experimental results are presented in terms of the test phenomena, hysteresis curves (corresponding skeleton curves, energy dissipation capacity parameters and stiffness degradation curves), and the displacements and strains at key positions. The test results show that the proposed joint can achieve the expected replaceable and hysteresis performance, the joint with welded web connections is prone to welding tear failures, and the connecting plate thickness and the stiffeners have an insubstantial influence on the performance. Finally, finite element models are built and validated through comparisons with the test results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available