Effect of cloprostenol sodium dose on luteal blood flow and volume measurements in Holstein heifers with both day-4 and day-10 corpora lutea

Establishment of a vascular system within the corpus luteum (CL) is critical for progesterone (P-4) secretion. Measurement of luteal blood flow (LBF) may be a feasible way to determine luteolysis induced with cloprostenol sodium (CLO). Our overall objective was to establish timelines to assess luteolysis via Doppler ultrasonography. Estrous cycles were synchronized in 11- to 12-mo-old Holstein heifers (n = 37). Heifers were injected CLO at a random stage of the estrous cycle 12 d from treatment. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was administered 2 (d -10) and 8 d (d -4) after the initial CLO. This satisfied the study objective of inducing simultaneous presence of CL at d 4 of development (D4 CL) and CL at d 10 of development (D10 CL) on the day of treatment with different CLO doses (hereafter referred to as d 0). Heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 treatments on d 0: negative control (NC) consisting of no treatment with CLO (n = 8); a quarter dose of CLO (0.125 mg; n = 8); half dose of CLO (0.25 mg; n = 8); full dose of CLO (0.5 mg; n = 8); or positive control (PC) consisting of 4 doses of 0.5 mg of CLO at 24-h intervals starting at d 0 (n = 5). Data collection was performed at d 0 (before and 1 h after treatment) and 2, 4, 6, and 8 d following treatment, to determine luteal volume (LV), LBF, and circulating concentrations of P-4. Both NC and PC were efficient in mimicking physiological scenarios that occur during normal luteal development and luteolysis. Heifers that received PC had complete LBF disappearance of both D4 and D10 CL between d 2 and 4 after the first of 4 CLO treatments given 24 h apart (average 4.0 +/- 0.0 and 3.2 +/- 0.7 d, respectively). Complete LBF disappearance was used as a luteolysis marker. Treatment with different doses of CLO did not impair luteal development of the D4 CL. However, concurrent complete LBF disappearance for D10 CL in heifers treated with half (5/8 heifers) and full doses of CLO (8/8 heifers) resulted in less LBF in the half dose, and less LV and LBF in the full-dose treatment, in D4 CL at d 8 post-treatment, compared with NC. Treatment with various doses of CLO induced an acute increase in LBF 1 h after treatment, regardless of dose in D10 but not in D4 CL. We found a lack of dose response in LV reduction of D4 and D10 CL. Interestingly, LV of the D10 CL decreased in untreated NC between d 0 and 8 after treatment (d 10-18 of luteal development). Assessment with color Doppler ultrasound was sensitive enough to identify dose-response patterns in Holstein heifers (absence, partial, or complete luteolysis) following various doses of CLO. Variability in time to complete LBF disappearance of mature D10 CL following a full dose of CLO limits the use of Doppler ultrasonography to detect luteolysis at a single time point following treatment.

Automated summary

The study aimed to establish timelines for assessing luteolysis via Doppler ultrasonography. Different doses of CLO had varying effects on the corpus luteum, with the full dose treatment resulting in less LBF and LV reduction.