4.7 Article

Pomegranate peel (Punica granatum L) extract and Chinese gall (Galla chinensis) extract inhibit Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Listeria monocytogenes on cooked shrimp and raw tuna

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 695-699

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.06.050

Keywords

Chinese gallnut; Pomegranate; Vibrio; Listeria; Shrimp; Tuna

Funding

  1. Virginia Seafood Agricultural Research and Extension Center
  2. Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. Hatch Act Capacity Grant Program of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Listeria monocytogenes are bacterial pathogens associated with raw or ready-to-eat seafood products. Many compounds extracted from plant material have shown promise for inhibiting bacterial pathogens when applied to some foods. In this study, aqueous methanol extracts from pomegranate peel (Punica granatum L.) and Chinese gallnut (Galla chinensis) were tested against V. parahaemolyticus and L monocytogenes on cooked shrimp and raw homogenized tuna. The extracts were applied to the shrimp by soaking for 2 min (5 mg/ml). The extracts (1.7 mg ml) were added to homogenized tuna and stirred. The antimicrobial assay on V. parahaemolyticus was conducted at 12 degrees C, and the assay on tuna was conducted at both 4 degrees and 12 degrees C. Both Chinese gall and pomegranate peel extracts significantly inhibited the growth of V. parahaemolyticus in both shrimp and tuna. Only Chinese gall extract significantly inhibited growth of L. monocytogenes. Overall V parahaemolyticus was more sensitive to both plant extracts compared with L. monocytogenes. Both plant extracts had stronger antimicrobial activity on shrimp compared with the tuna. Neither extract completely inhibited the growth of V parahaemolyticus or L. monocytogenes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available