Objective and Subjective Comparisons of Split Thickness Skin Graft and Full Thickness Skin Graft for Radial Forearm Flap Donor Sites Using a New Measuring Method

A split thickness skin graft (STSG) or a full thickness skin graft (FTSG) are commonly used for donor site closure after raising a radial forearm flap. The aesthetic outcome of the donor site is frequently not satisfying for the patient. This study evaluated the aesthetic outcome of the donor site of a radial forearm flap covered with an STSG or FTSG using an objective measurement method. The forearms of 30 patients (15 FTSG, 15 STSG) were scanned with an optical three-dimensional scanner. The surface of the forearm at the skin transplant was cut out and filled by an automatic hole-filling algorithm. The mean surface deviation between the original and the filled forearm was acquired. This method was validated with a control group of 15 volunteers. A questionnaire investigating aesthetical and healing satisfaction, postoperative pain and scarring was filled in by the patients. The mean surface difference in the STSG group was 0.9907 +/- 0.3120 and 0.6177 +/- 0.2245 mm in the FTSG group. The difference in the surface deviation between STSG and FTSG groups was significant (P = 0.0009). Correlations between the surface deviation and the subjective aesthetical satisfaction of the patient were not significant. In the questionnaires no significant differences between STSG and FTSG group were measured. Both FTSGs and STSGs resulted in good aesthetical outcomes after closure of a radial forearm flap donor site. Scanning the radial forearm flap donor site with an optical three-dimensional scanner supplied an objective, fast, and reliable measuring method of aesthetical outcomes.

Automated summary

This study evaluated the aesthetic outcome of donor sites after using FTSG or STSG for radial forearm flap closure. Both techniques resulted in good aesthetic outcomes, with FTSG showing significantly less surface deviation than STSG. The objective measurement method provided by scanning with an optical three-dimensional scanner was found to be reliable and fast for assessing aesthetic outcomes.