The Comparison of Conventional Osteotomes and Magic Saws in Terms of Edema and Ecchymosis After Rhinoplasty

Objective: The goal of this study was to compare conventional osteotomes and Magic Saws in terms of edema and ecchymosis, in rhinoplasty patients. Study Design: A retrospective, case-control study. Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, we evaluated the results of 258 rhinoplasty patients who underwent osteotomy by either conventional osteotomes or new designed saws called; ''Magic Saws.'' On postoperative days 2 and 7, the patients were photographed by the surgeon; photographs were evaluated by another otolaryngologist, blinded from the osteotomy procedure. Results: There were no statistically differences between the groups, in terms of age, sex, weight, or average arterial blood pressure (P>0.05). The postoperative periorbital edema (days 2 and 7) and ecchymosis (day 2) scores were significantly higher in the conventional osteotomy group, as compared to Magic Saw group (P<0.05). However, on postoperative day 7, the differences in the periorbital ecchymosis scores between the groups, were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions: As compared to conventional osteotomes, Magic Saws were reported to be associated with minimal soft tissue injury, as well as decreased edema and ecchymosis, in the early postoperative period after rhinoplasty.

Automated summary

This study compared the effects of conventional osteotomes and Magic Saws in rhinoplasty. The results showed that Magic Saws were associated with minimal soft tissue injury and decreased edema and ecchymosis in the early postoperative period.