4.6 Article

Reconstructing teleparallel gravity with cosmic structure growth and expansion rate data

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/06/015

Keywords

cosmological parameters from LSS; dark energy theory; modified gravity; cosmological perturbation theory

Funding

  1. COST Action [CA18108]
  2. Cosmology@MALTA - University of Malta
  3. European Regional Development Fund A supercomputing laboratory for the University of Malta [ERDF-080]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilizes a combined approach of Hubble parameter and redshift-space-distortion data to reconstruct the teleparallel gravity Lagrangian via Gaussian processes. Different combinations of datasets and kernels indicate that nontrivial cosmology beyond ΛCDM falls within the uncertainties of the reconstructions, suggesting no significant departure from the concordance cosmological model.
In this work, we use a combined approach of Hubble parameter data together with redshift-space-distortion (f sigma(8)) data, which together are used to reconstruct the teleparallel gravity (TG) Lagrangian via Gaussian processes (GP). The adopted Hubble data mainly comes from cosmic chronometers, while for the Type Ia supernovae data we use the latest jointly calibrated Pantheon compilation. Moreover, we consider two main GP covariance functions, namely the squared-exponential and Cauchy kernels in order to show consistency (to within 1 sigma uncertainties). The core results of this work are the numerical reconstructions of the TG Lagrangian from GP reconstructed Hubble and growth data. We take different possible combinations of the datasets and kernels to illustrate any potential differences in this regard. We show that nontrivial cosmology beyond Lambda CDM falls within the uncertainties of the reconstructions from growth data, which therefore indicates no significant departure from the concordance cosmological model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available