4.6 Article

Blind map level systematics cleaning: a quadratic estimator approach

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/016

Keywords

CMBR detectors; CMBR experiments; CMBR polarisation; gravitational waves and CMBR polarization

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) studentships
  2. STFC [ST/T007222/1, ST/T000341/1, ST/P000649/1]
  3. ERC Consolidator Grant CMBSPEC, European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [725456]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a detailed case study using QE estimators to diagnose and remove systematics in observed CMB maps, focusing on temperature to polarization leakage. A new Gaussian filtering scheme is introduced for stable convergence of iterative cleaning process, and performance is evaluated on idealized and realistic simulations. Likelihood analysis demonstrates unbiased measurement of the tensor-to-scalar ratio, reducing systematic induced B-mode power significantly.
We present the first detailed case study using quadratic estimators (QE) to diagnose and remove systematics present in observed Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) maps. In this work we focus on the temperature to polarization leakage. We use an iterative QE analysis to remove systematics, in analogy to de-lensing, recovering the primordial B-mode signal and the systematic maps. We introduce a new Gaussian filtering scheme crucial to stable convergence of the iterative cleaning procedure and validate with comparisons to semi-analytical forecasts. We study the limitations of this method by examining its performance both on idealized simulations and on more realistic, non-ideal simulations, where we assume varying de-lensing efficiencies. Finally, we quantify the systematic cleaning efficiency by presenting a likelihood analysis on the tensor to scalar ratio, r, and demonstrate that the blind cleaning results in an un-biased measurement of r, reducing the systematic induced B-mode power by nearly two orders of magnitude.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available