4.5 Article

Continuum damage mechanics based ductile fatigue-fracture prediction in buckling steel braces

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106812

Keywords

Ductile fracture; Continuum damage mechanics; Ultra low cycle fatigue

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51908416]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [19PJ1409500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on using a Continuum Damage Mechanics criterion to predict Ultra Low Cycle Fatigue fracture in buckling steel braces. The approach was found to predict fracture in a satisfactory manner, with small-scale coupon specimens unable to accurately calibrate the constitutive model to capture localization.
A Continuum Damage Mechanics criterion (the Stress Weighted Ductile Fracture Model SWDFM) is used to predict Ultra Low Cycle Fatigue fracture in buckling steel braces. The focus is to examine the efficacy of this approach for predicting fracture in large-scale structural components with localization, when the constitutive and fracture parameters have been calibrated only at the coupon scale. A dataset consisting of 11 two-thirds scale, cyclically loaded, hollow brace specimens, and corresponding material coupon specimens is utilized for assessment of the fracture prediction approach. In these tests, fracture occurs either at the center where cyclic local buckling amplifies the strains, or at the gusset-plate connections. Particle Swarm Optimization is used to calibrate material constitutive parameters based on load-deformation response of the coupon tests, whereas the SWDFM parameters are calibrated using their fracture response. These parameters are applied within Continuum Finite Element simulations of the brace tests. The results indicate that the approach predicts fracture in a satisfactory manner. The error in fracture predictions is most correlated with the error in predicting the event of localization (i.e., local buckling). There does not appear to be a strong relationship between the error in the constitutive model calibration (based on the coupon tests) and the prediction of either local buckling or fracture. This suggests that in themselves, the small-scale coupon specimens are unable to calibrate the constitutive model with the required accuracy to capture localization. Commentary is provided for calibration and application of the CDM-based approach to predict fracture. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available