4.7 Article

Spatio-temporal distribution and natural variation of metabolites in citrus fruits

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 199, Issue -, Pages 8-17

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.113

Keywords

Citrus fruits; Metabolite profiling; Natural variation; Amino acid; Flavonoids

Funding

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB100600, 2013CB127001]
  2. National High Technology R&D Program of China (863 Program) [2012AA10A303, 2012AA10A304]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070267, 31221062]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education in China [NCET-09-0401, NCET-13-0810]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To study the natural variation and spatio-temporal accumulation of citrus metabolites, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based metabolome analysis was performed on four fruit tissues (flavedo, albedo, segment membrane and juice sacs) and different Citrus species (lemon, pummelo and grapefruit, sweet orange and mandarin). Using a non-targeted metabolomics approach, more than 2000 metabolite signals were detected, from which more than 54 metabolites, including amino acids, flavonoids and limonoids, were identified/annotated. Differential accumulation patterns of both primary metabolites and secondary metabolites in various tissues and species were revealed by our study. Further investigation indicated that flavedo accumulates more flavonoids while juice sacs contain more amino acids. Besides this, cluster analysis based on the levels of metabolites detected in 47 individual Citrus accessions clearly grouped them into four distinct clusters: pummelos and grapefruits, lemons, sweet oranges and mandarins, while the cluster of pummelos and grapefruits lay distinctly apart from the other three species. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available