4.4 Article

Characterization and comparison of properties of cryogenic conditioned CNT reinforced thermoset (epoxy) and thermoplastic (poly vinyl alcohol) composite yarns

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume 55, Issue 30, Pages 4503-4511

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00219983211041764

Keywords

Carbon nanotube yarn; epoxy; poly vinyl alcohol; cryogenic condition

Funding

  1. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [20ZR1402200]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2232021G-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that carbon nanotube (CNT) fiber/yarn reinforced composites have potential applications in aerospace and space industry. The mechanical and electrical properties of CNT/EP and CNT/PVA composite yarns were enhanced after low-temperature treatment, but showed different changes after multiple cyclic cryogenic conditions.
Carbon nanotube (CNT) fiber/yarn reinforced composites are considered as a new generation of advanced materials for applications in aerospace and space industry. In this study, two types of CNT composite yarns were produced by twisting CNT films and infiltrating with thermoset epoxy (EP) and thermoplastic poly vinyl alcohol (PVA) resins. The tensile strength of CNT/PVA and CNT/EP composite yarn was 409.91 MPa and 206.87 MPa, much higher than that of pure CNT yarn (129.94 MPa). After mono-cryogenic condition, the mechanical and electrical properties of CNT/EP and CNT/PVA composite yarns were both enhanced due to the structure reorder of the CNT bundles and improvement of interfacial bonding. However, after 60 times cyclic-cryogenic conditions, CNT/EP composite yarn showed a similar to 10% degradation of tensile strength; while CNT/PVA composite yarn exhibited 6% increment. This study provides fundamental data of the CNT reinforced thermoset and thermoplastic composite yarns for their practical applications in cryogenic environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available