4.6 Article

Factors influencing the aesthetics of smile: An observational study on clinical assessment and patient's perception

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 11, Pages 1449-1457

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13531

Keywords

aesthetics; epidemiology; gingiva; smiling; tooth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the aesthetics of smile and potential influencing factors. Clinical assessment and patient perception were found to not correlate, emphasizing the importance of attention to specific variables such as depth and location of gingival recessions in providing a comprehensive aesthetic analysis of smile.
Aim To clinically assess the aesthetics of smile and the possible influencing factors. Materials and methods In this explorative study, an initial questionnaire on demographic variables and perception of own quality of smile (Visual Analogue Scale) was administered by a first examiner. A second blinded assessor examined all patients and recorded clinical data. In addition, for each patient, the Smile Aesthetic Index (SEI) was calculated. Descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic models were performed. Results One hundred consecutive subjects were enrolled. The mean SEI was 8.4 +/- 1.2, while the mean patient's perception of smile was 7.1 +/- 2.0. However, they did not correlate (r = 0.16 from -0.04 to 0.34; p = .12). Gingival recessions were perceived by 21.9% of subjects, tooth alignment by 38.6%, tooth dyschromia by 34.3%, and missing papilla/diastema by 26.7%. In particular, gingival recessions were perceived when they were deeper (p = .0342), located in the upper jaw (p = .0223), and corresponding to incisors (p < .0001) and canines (p = .0159) with respect to molars. Conclusions Clinical assessment and patient perception represent two important diagnostic phases. However, there is no correlation between them. Attention should be given to specific variables to provide the most comprehensive aesthetic analysis of smile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available