4.6 Review

Serum antibody response against periodontal bacteria and coronary heart disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 1570-1586

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13550

Keywords

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans; antibodies; coronary heart disease; periodontitis; Porphyromonas gingivalis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The meta-analysis showed a significant association between elevated serum IgG antibody responses (anti-Pg and anti-Aa) and CHD, suggesting their potential use as biomarkers for detecting and monitoring at-risk populations. However, inconsistencies in the design and interpretation of immunoassays highlight the need for standardization in assessing antibody responses against periodontal bacteria.
Aim The present systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the strength of a reported association between elevated serum anti-periodontal bacterial antibody responses and coronary heart disease (CHD). Materials and methods Twenty original studies were identified after systematically searching five databases. The majority (n = 11) compared serum anti-Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) and/or anti-Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa) IgG antibody responses between CHD patients and control participants. The strength of the association between serum anti-Pg antibodies and CHD (n = 10) and serum anti-Aa antibodies and CHD (n = 6) was investigated using a meta-analysis approach separately. Results Most studies (61%) reported that the serum IgG antibody responses were elevated in CHD patients than in controls. The meta-analyses showed a significant association between elevated serum IgG antibody responses (anti-Pg and anti-Aa) and CHD, with pooled odds ratios of 1.23 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.38, p = .001] and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.04-1.47, p = .0004), respectively. Conclusions A modest increase of CHD events in individuals with higher serum anti-Pg and anti-Aa IgG antibody responses may support their use as potential biomarkers to detect and monitor at-risk populations. However, the observed inconsistencies with the design and interpretation of immunoassays warrant standardization of the immunoassays assessing antibody responses against periodontal bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available