4.7 Article

Randomized Phase II Trial of MIBG Versus MIBG, Vincristine, and Irinotecan Versus MIBG and Vorinostat for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A Report From NANT Consortium

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 31, Pages 3506-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.00703

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [P01 CA081403, P01 CA217959, 1R01 CA172067, R35 CA220500]
  2. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation
  3. Friends for Life
  4. Children's Neuroblastoma Cancer Foundation
  5. Dougherty Foundation
  6. Evan Dunbar Foundation
  7. Pediatric Cancer Research Foundation
  8. Merck Co Inc
  9. V Foundation for Cancer Research
  10. St Baldrick's Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to identify the MIBG regimen with the highest true response rate for neuroblastoma treatment. The results indicated that the combination of vorinostat and MIBG showed the highest true response rate and manageable toxicity, while vincristine and irinotecan did not improve the response rate and were associated with increased toxicity.
PURPOSE I-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is an active radiotherapeutic for neuroblastoma. The primary aim of this trial was to identify which of three MIBG regimens was likely associated with the highest true response rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients 1-30 years were eligible if they had relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, at least one MIBG-avid site, and adequate autologous stem cells. Patients received MIBG 18 mCi/kg on day 1 and autologous stem cell on day 15. Patients randomly assigned to arm A received only MIBG; patients randomly assigned to arm B received intravenous vincristine on day 0 and irinotecan daily on days 0-4; patients randomly assigned to arm C received vorinostat (180 mg/m(2)/dose) orally once daily on days 1 to 12. The primary end point was response after one course by New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy criteria. The trial was designed with 105 patients to ensure an 80% chance that the arm with highest response rate was selected. RESULTS One hundred fourteen patients were enrolled, with three ineligible and six unevaluable, leaving 105 eligible and evaluable patients (36 in arm A, 35 in arm B, and 34 in arm C; 55 boys; and median age 6.5 years). After one course, the response rates (partial response or better) on arms A, B, and C were 14% (95% CI, 5 to 30), 14% (5 to 31), and 32% (18 to 51). An additional five, five, and four patients met New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Minor Response criteria on arms A, B, and C, respectively. On arms A, B, and C, rates of any grade 3+ nonhematologic toxicity after first course were 19%, 49%, and 35%. CONCLUSION Vorinostat and MIBG is likely the arm with the highest true response rate, with manageable toxicity. Vincristine and irinotecan do not appear to improve the response rate to MIBG and are associated with increased toxicity. (C) 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available