4.7 Article

Determination of paraquat and diquat: LC-MS method optimization and validation

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 209, Issue -, Pages 248-255

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.069

Keywords

Cowpea; Bipyridylium herbicides; Paraquat; Diquat; UPLC-MS/MS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes the optimization and single-laboratory validation of a single residue method for determination of two bipyridylium herbicides, paraquat and diquat, in cowpeas by UPLC-MS/MS in a total run time of 9.3 min. The method is based on extraction with an acidified methanol-water mixture. Different extraction parameters (extraction solvent composition, temperature, sample extract filtration, and pre-treatment of the laboratory sample) were evaluated in order to optimize the extraction method efficiency. Isotopically labeled internal standards, Paraquat-D6 and Diquat-D4, were used and added to the test portions prior to extraction. The method validation was performed by analyzing spiked samples at three concentrations (10, 20 and 50 mu g kg(-1)), with seven replicates (n = 7) for each concentration. Linearity (r(2)) of analytical curves, accuracy (trueness as recovery % and precision as RSD%), instrument and method limits of detection and quantification (LOD and LOQ) and matrix effects were determined. Average recoveries obtained for diquat were between 77 and 85% with RSD values <= 20%, for all spike levels studied. On the other hand, paraquat showed average recoveries between 68 and 103% with RSDs in the range 14.4-25.4%. The method LOQ was 10 and 20 mu g kg(-1) for diquat and paraquat, respectively. The matrix effect was significant for both pesticides. Consequently, matrix-matched calibration standards and using isotopically labeled (IL) analogues as internal standards for the target analytes are required for application in routine analysis. The validated method was successfully applied for cowpea samples obtained from various field studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available