4.7 Article

Sensory interactions between six common aroma vectors explain four main red wine aroma nuances

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 199, Issue -, Pages 447-456

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.12.048

Keywords

Odour mixtures; Aroma interactions; Reconstituted wines; Suppression effects; Furaneol; Damascenone; Fusel alcohols

Funding

  1. Spanish MINECO [AGL2010-22355, AGL2014-59840]
  2. MINECO
  3. Diputacion General de Aragon [T53]
  4. Fondo Social Europeo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work aims at assessing the aromatic sensory dimensions linked to 6 common wine aroma vectors (N, norisoprenoids; A, branched acids; F, enolones; E, branched ethyl esters; L, fusel alcohols, M, wood compounds) varying in their natural range of occurrence. Wine models were built by adding the vectors at two levels (fractional factorial design 2(VI)) to a de-aromatised aged red wine. Twenty other different models were evaluated by descriptive analysis. Red, black and dried fruits and woody notes were satisfactorily reproduced. Individual vectors explained just 15% of the sensory space, mostly dependent on perceptual interactions. N influences dried and black fruits and suppresses red fruits. A suppresses black fruits and enhances red and dried fruits. F exerts a major role on red fruits. E suppresses dried fruits and modulates black fruits. L is revealed as a strong suppressor of red fruits and particularly of woody notes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available