4.7 Article

Frequency and Prognostic Impact of ALK Amplifications and Mutations in the European Neuroblastoma Study Group (SIOPEN) High-Risk Neuroblastoma Trial (HR-NBL1)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 30, Pages 3377-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.00086

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Annenberg Foundation
  2. Association Hubert Gouin Enfance et Cancer, France
  3. Federation Enfants Cancers Sante, Les Bagouz a Manon, Les amis de Claire
  4. SiRIC/INCa [INCa-DGOS-4654]
  5. PHRC [IC2007-09]
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Investissements d'Avenir program) [ANR-10-EQPX-03, ANR-10-INBS-09-08]
  7. Canceropole Ile-de-France
  8. SiRIC-Curie program SiRIC [INCa-DGOS-4654]
  9. Neuroblastoma UK
  10. Cancer Research UK
  11. Department of Health
  12. Families against Neuroblastoma
  13. Solving Kids' Cancer
  14. Action Medical Research/Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity
  15. CCLG
  16. European Commission 5th Frame Work Grant (SIOPEN-R-NET EC) [QLRI-CT-2002-01768]
  17. Belgium: vzw Kinderkankerfonds
  18. Belgium: Kom op tegen Kanker
  19. Czech Republic: MH CZDRO
  20. Czech Republic: University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
  21. Israel: Hayim Association-for Children
  22. Israel: Cancer in Israel, Ramat Gan
  23. Italy: Fondazione Italiana per la Lotta al Neuroblastoma O.N.L.U.S. c/o Istituto G. Gaslini
  24. Italy: Gaslini
  25. Italy: Genova
  26. Italy: Associazione Bianca Garavaglia O.N.L.U.S.
  27. Italy: Busto Arsizio
  28. Spain: Grant FIS [EC10/303]
  29. Spain: Asociacion Pablo Ugarte
  30. Spain: Cancercare Xavia
  31. Spain: Sumemos Muchas Manos
  32. Spain:Heath Institute Carlos III (ISCIII)
  33. Spain: FEDER (European Regional Development Fund) [PI17/01558, CIBERONC-CB16/12/00484]
  34. NEN Association [2017-PVR00157]
  35. Switzerland: Oncosuisse, Bern
  36. Swiss Cancer League, Bern
  37. Fond'action contre le Cancer, Lausanne
  38. FORCE Fondation Recherche sur le Cancer de l'Enfant, Ecublens

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic alterations of ALK (clonal mutations and amplifications) in high-risk neuroblastoma patients are independent predictors of poorer survival. These data provide a rationale for the integration of ALK inhibitors in upfront treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with ALK alterations.
PURPOSE In neuroblastoma (NB), the ALK receptor tyrosine kinase can be constitutively activated through activating point mutations or genomic amplification. We studied ALK genetic alterations in high-risk (HR) patients on the HR-NBL1/SIOPEN trial to determine their frequency, correlation with clinical parameters, and prognostic impact. MATERIALS AND METHODS Diagnostic tumor samples were available from 1,092 HR-NBL1/SIOPEN patients to determine ALK amplification status (n = 330), ALK mutational profile (n = 191), or both (n = 571). RESULTS Genomic ALK amplification (ALKa) was detected in 4.5% of cases (41 out of 901), all except one with MYCN amplification (MNA). ALKa was associated with a significantly poorer overall survival (OS) (5-year OS: ALKa [n = 41] 28% [95% CI, 15 to 421; no-ALKa [n = 860] 51% [95% CI, 47 to 54], [P < .001]), particularly in cases with metastatic disease. ALK mutations (ALKm) were detected at a clonal level (> 20% mutated allele fraction) in 10% of cases (76 out of 762) and at a subclonal level (mutated allele fraction 0.1%-20%) in 3.9% of patients (30 out of 762), with a strong correlation between the presence of ALKm and MNA (P< .001). Among 571 cases with known ALKa and ALKm status, a statistically significant difference in OS was observed between cases with ALKa or clonal ALKm versus subclonal ALKm or no ALK alterations (5-year OS: ALKa En = 19], 26% [95% CI, 10 to 47], clonal ALKm En = 65] 33% [95% CI, 21 to 44], subclonal ALKm (n = 22) 48% [95% CI, 26 to 67], and no alteration En = 465], 51% [95% CI, 46 to 55], respectively; P = .001). Importantly, in a multivariate model, involvement of more than one metastatic compartment (hazard ratio [HR], 2.87; P < .001), ALKa (HR, 2.38; P = .004), and clonal ALKm (HR, 1.77; P = .001) were independent predictors of poor outcome. CONCLUSION Genetic alterations of ALK (clonal mutations and amplifications) in HR-NB are independent predictors of poorer survival. These data provide a rationale for integration of ALK inhibitors in upfront treatment of HR-NB with ALK alterations. (C) 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available