4.3 Article

Effects of paired associated stimulation with different stimulation position on motor cortex excitability and upper limb motor function in patients with cerebral infarction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 363-369

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.06.028

Keywords

Cerebral infarction; Paired associative stimulation; Cortical plasticity; Motor cortex excitability; Motor function

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effects of PAS with different stimulation positions on patients with cerebral infarction, and found that bilateral stimulation group had the best outcomes. PAS stimulation on the contralesional or ipsilesional side can change the excitability of the motor cortex, affecting the recovery of upper limb function.
Objective: To investigate the effects of paired associated stimulation (PAS) with different stimulation position on motor cortex excitability and upper limb motor function in patients with cerebral infarction. Method: A total of 120 volunteers with cerebral infarction were randomly divided into four groups. Based on conventional rehabilitation treatment, the PAS stimulation group was given the corresponding position of PAS treatment once a day for 28 consecutive days. The MEP amplitude and RMT of both hemispheres were assessed before and after treatment, and a simple upper limb Function Examination Scale (STEF) score, simplified upper limb Fugl-Meyer score (FMA), and improved Barthel Index (MBI) were used to assess upper limb motor function in the four groups. Results: Following PAS, the MEP amplitude decreased, and the RMT of abductor pollicis brevis (APB) increased on the contralesional side, while the MEP amplitude increased and the RMT of APB decreased on the ipsilesional side. After 28 consecutive days the scores of STEF, FMA, and MBI in the bilateral stimulation group were significantly better than those in the ipsilesional stimulation group and the contralesional stimulation group, but there was no significant difference in the scores of STEF, FMA, and MBI between the ipsilesional stimulation group and the contralesional stimulation group. Conclusion: The excitability of the motor cortex can be changed when the contralesional side or the ipsilesional side was given the corresponding PAS stimulation, while the bilateral PAS stimulation can more easily cause a change of excitability of the motor cortex, resulting in better recovery of the upper limb function. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available