4.7 Article

A Semiautomated Luciferase Immunoprecipitation Assay for Rapid and Easy Detection of African Swine Fever Virus Antibody

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00990-21

Keywords

African swine fever virus; luciferase immunoprecipitation system; magnetic beads; rapid; sensitivity

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology of Hubei province, China [2019ABA08]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2018YFC0840402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed a rapid and easy to operate MB-LIPS assay for detecting ASFV antibodies in swine sera, showing high sensitivity and accuracy with results available within 30 minutes.
African swine fever (ASF) is a highly contagious viral disease of domestic pigs and wild boars. For disease surveillance and control, we developed a rapid and easy luciferase immunoprecipitation assay (MB-LIPS) to detect ASF virus (ASFV) antibody. The MB-LIPS is based on magnetic beads modified with protein A/G and the recombinant fusion protein of ASFV p30 and luciferase, where p30 functioned as the recognition element and luciferase as the signal component. Incubation and washing could be finished automatically on a machine with magnetic rods. Under optimal conditions, the MB-LIPS showed 96.3% agreement to a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for detecting ASFV antibody in swine sera. Analyzing serial dilutions of a swine serum sample showed that the MP-LIPS assay was 4 times more sensitive than the ELISA kit. The whole run of the MB-LIPS could be completed within 30 min. With its high sensitivity and simple operation, the MB-LIPS platform has great potential to be used for the detection of ASFV antibody and ASF control in small labs and farms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available