4.7 Article

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods for Burkholderia cenocepacia and Burkholderia multivorans Isolates from Cystic Fibrosis Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01447-21

Keywords

Burkholderia; antimicrobial agents; cystic fibrosis; susceptibility testing

Categories

Funding

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation [JORTH19I0, JORTH17F5]
  2. NIH [K22AI127473]
  3. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the reproducibility and accuracy of different antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC). The findings showed poor accuracy for disk diffusion and MicroScan WalkAway methods, while broth microdilution method demonstrated higher reproducibility for meropenem and minocycline.
The Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) is known for causing serious lung infections in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). These infections can require lung transplantation, eligibility for which may be guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). While the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommends AST for BCC, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) does not, due to poor method performance and correlation with clinical outcomes. Furthermore, limited data exist on the performance of automated AST methods for BCC. To address these issues, reproducibility and accuracy were evaluated for disk diffusion (DD), broth microdilution (BMD), and MicroScan WalkAway using 50 B. cenocepacia and 50 B. multivorans isolates collected from people with CF. The following drugs were evaluated in triplicate: chloramphenicol (CAM), ceftazidime (CAZ), meropenem (MEM), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), minocycline (MIN), levofloxacin (LVX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), and piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ). BMD reproducibility was >= 95% for MEM and MIN only, and MicroScan WalkAway reproducibility was similar to BMD. DD reproducibility was, 90% for all drugs tested when a 3 mm cut-off was applied. When comparing the accuracy of DD to BMD, only MEM met all acceptance criteria. TMP-SMX and LVX had high minor errors, CAZ had unacceptable very major errors (VME), and MIN, PIP-TAZ, and CIP had both unacceptable minor errors and VMEs. For MicroScan WalkAway, no drugs met acceptance criteria. Analyses also showed that errors were not attributed to one species. In general, our data agree with EUCAST recommendations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available