4.7 Article

Anthropogenic Influences on Tornadic Storms

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 34, Issue 22, Pages 8989-9006

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0901.1

Keywords

Climate change; Convective storms; Regional models

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Defense, Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) [RC19-5264]
  2. Office of Science of the U.S. DOE [DEAC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of climate change on tornadoes remains uncertain due to inconsistencies in data and model limitations. Research shows that the potential for tornadoes varies depending on the climate state and seasonality of events, with some experiencing increased potential while others see a decrease.
The impact of climate change on severe storms and tornadoes remains uncertain, largely owing to inconsistencies in observational data and limitations of climate models. We performed ensembles of convection-permitting climate model simulations to examine how three tornadic storms would change if similar events were to occur in pre-industrial and future climates. The choice of events includes winter, nocturnal, and spring tornadic storms to provide insight into how the timing and seasonality of storms may affect their response to climate change. Updraft helicity (UH), convective available potential energy (CAPE), storm-relative helicity (SRH), and convective inhibition (CIN) were used to determine the favorability for the three tornadic storm events in the different climate states. We found that from the pre-industrial period to the present, the potential for tornadic storms decreased for the winter event and increased for the nocturnal and spring events. With future climate change, the potential for tornadic storms increased for the winter and nocturnal events in association with increased CAPE, and decreased for the spring event despite greater CAPE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available