4.7 Article

Calculation of greenhouse gas emissions for a carbon recycling system using mineral carbon capture and utilization technology in the cement industry

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 312, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127618

Keywords

CO2 calculation; Cement industry; Cement and concrete value chain; Carbon recycling; Mineral carbon capture and utilization; Recarbonate

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  2. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cement production and usage consume a significant amount of energy and resources, accounting for approximately 7% of global man-made greenhouse gas emissions. The industry is developing low-carbon technologies to reduce CO2 emissions. The use of MCC&U technology can substantially decrease CO2 emissions in cement production.
Cement is widely produced and used. Cement production consumes a significant amount of energy and natural resources, and it accounts for approximately 7% of man-made greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in CO2 equivalents globally. The cement industry is continually conducting research and development into energy conserving and low-carbon technologies to reduce CO2 emissions. Furthermore, the industry will be at the heart of a carbon recycling system along cement and concrete value chain using newly developed mineral carbon capture and utilization (MCC&U) technology to reduce CO2 emissions substantially during clinker and/or cement production. This paper provides fundamental calculations for the determination of CO2 emissions from the MCC&U technology in the cement industry, which will contribute to the calculation of GHG inventories and life cycle assessments of the system. Demonstration experiments were conducted to develop an accounting formula and clearly determine CO2 emissions for recarbonate utilization as a cement raw material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available