4.7 Article

Study on pore and chemical structure characteristics of atmospheric circulating fluidized bed coal gasification fly ash

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 308, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127395

Keywords

Coal gasification fly ash; Physicochemical properties; Comprehensive fractal dimension

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0602001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that coal gasification fly ash (CGFA) has a developed pore structure and high carbon content, with loose carbon structure and good chemical reaction activity, making it suitable for secondary combustion and gasification as fuel.
The pore and chemical structure characteristics of the raw coal and the coal gasification fly ash (CGFA) in an atmospheric pressure circulating fluidized bed gasifier with a gas production capacity of 20000 and 40000 Nm3 h-1 were studied. The results indicated the presence of developed pore structure and high carbon content of the CGFA. The comprehensive fractal dimension method was proposed to analyze the pore structure of the pore section. The comprehensive fractal dimension was found to be > 2.6. The surface of CGFA is rough and porous. When compared to raw coal, the relative content of the CGFA carbon functional group is lower than 20%, and that of aliphatic carbon gets reduced. The interlamellar spacing (0.3489 nm, 0.3501 nm) of the A-filter cake ash (FCAA), A-dry ash (DAA), B-filter cake ash (FCAB), and B-dry ash (DAB) carbon is higher than that of the standard graphite (0.3354 nm), lean coal (0.3468 nm), and anthracite (0.344 nm). Moreover, the carbon structure is loose. The comprehensive results of physical and chemical structure revealed that CGFA showed a good chemical reaction activity and also the value of secondary combustion and gasification as fuel. This study exhibits significance and importance in the field of waste valorization towards a circular economy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available