4.7 Article

Development of indoor environmental quality index using a low-cost monitoring platform

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 312, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127846

Keywords

Indoor environmental quality index; Low-cost monitoring platform; IoT sensing; Occupant comfort; Subjective assessment

Funding

  1. ASHRAE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fundamental goal of modern high-performance buildings is to achieve low environmental carbon footprint while securing indoor conditions that promote human health and well-being. This research examined an overall IEQ assessment model through derivation of weighting coefficients for relevant IEQ parameters, and developed a low-cost open-source platform for continuous measurement of these parameters. Results showed that individual weighting coefficients for IEQ parameters differ across building types, and occupants in different types of buildings may have different preferences for these parameters.
The fundamental goal of modern high-performance buildings is to achieve low environmental carbon footprint while securing indoor conditions that promote human health and well-being. Current procedures for indoor environmental quality (IEQ) assessment are often sporadic, expensive, intrusive and often limited to few parameters and experts-use only. This research examines an overall IEQ assessment model in three field studies. The assessment of IEQ is achieved with the methodology for the integration of relevant IEQ parameters into an overall index through derivation of their individual weighting coefficients. A low-cost open-source platform ENVIRA was developed and deployed for continuous measurement of relevant IEQ parameters. A total of 125 occupants participated in the field studies-69 in two open offices and 56 in the educational building. The results from occupant survey regression analysis for offices showed that indoor air quality is the most critical IEQ parameter with the weight of 0.35 followed by thermal comfort (0.285), acoustic comfort (0.195) and illumination (0.17). The occupant preference differed in the educational building where thermal comfort was the most dominant component (0.31) followed by indoor air quality and acoustics (0.25), and lighting (0.19). Results show that individual weighting coefficients are not equivalent and could differ across building types. Finally, the mean absolute error between the average survey results and the overall IEQ index for the three field studies was <3% suggesting that the platform can be used for generating large IEQ datasets for researchers and practitioners.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available