4.7 Article

Review on state-of-health of lithium-ion batteries: Characterizations, estimations and applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 314, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128015

Keywords

Lithium-ion batteries; State-of-health; Battery pack; Battery management system; Practical applications

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51977007, 61633015, 52007006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews existing characteristic parameters in defining battery SOH, proposes suggestions, and discusses the impact of external factors on battery degradation. SOH monitoring goals and applications are summarized based on parameters such as capacity, impedance, and aging mechanisms.
State-of-health (SOH) monitoring of lithium-ion batteries plays a key role in the reliable and safe operation of battery systems. Influenced by multiple factors, SOH is an aging path-dependent parameter, which challenges its accurate estimation and prediction. Numerous methods have been proposed for lithium-ion batteries SOH diagnostics and prognostics, but there is little discussion on how to characterize SOH. In this paper, we first review the existing characteristic parameters in defining battery SOH at cell-level and pack-level, and then propose some suggestions for SOH definitions. The impact of external influencing factors on battery degradation is introduced to lay a foundation for SOH estimation. SOH estimation methods are categorized by the parameters used to define SOH, i.e. capacity, impedance and aging-mechanism parameters. We discuss the goals of SOH monitoring and summarize its applications from short- and long-term perspectives accordingly. Finally, the challenges and future trends of battery SOH diagnostics and prognostics are thoroughly analyzed and discussed, in order to provide a comprehensive understanding for researchers and technologists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available