4.7 Article

Structures of (NaSCN)2(H2O)n-/0 (n=0-7) and solvation induced ion pair separation: Gas phase anion photoelectron spectroscopy and theoretical calculations

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 154, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0049567

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773255]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z191100007219009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focused on (NaSCN)(2)(H2O)(n)(-) clusters in the gas phase, revealing a structural evolution from rhombic to SSIP type configurations as the number of water molecules increased.
We studied (NaSCN)(2)(H2O)(n)(-) clusters in the gas phase using size-selected anion photoelectron spectroscopy. The photoelectron spectra and vertical detachment energies of (NaSCN)(2)(H2O)(n)(-) (n = 0-5) were obtained in the experiment. The structures of (NaSCN)(2)(H2O)(n)(-/0) up to n = 7 were investigated with density functional theory calculations. Two series of peaks are observed in the spectra, indicating that two types of structures coexist, the high electron binding energy peaks correspond to the chain style structures, and the low electron binding energy peaks correspond to the Na-N-Na-N rhombic structures or their derivatives. For the (NaSCN)(2)(H2O)(n)(-) clusters at n = 3-5, the Na-N-Na-N rhombic structures are the dominant structures, the rhombic four-membered rings start to open at n = 4, and the solvent separated ion pair (SSIP) type of structures start to appear at n = 6. For the neutral (NaSCN)(2)(H2O)(n) clusters, the Na-N-Na-N rhombic isomers become the dominant starting at n = 3, and the SSIP type of structures start to appear at n = 5 and become dominant at n = 6. The structural evolution of (NaSCN)(2)(H2O)(n)(-/0) (n = 0-7) confirms the possible existence of ionic clusters such as Na(SCN)(2)(-) and Na-2(SCN)(+) in NaSCN aqueous solutions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available