Building intuition for binding free energy calculations: Bound state definition, restraints, and symmetry

The theory behind computation of absolute binding free energies using explicit-solvent molecular simulations is well-established, yet somewhat complex, with counter-intuitive aspects. This leads to frequent frustration, common misconceptions, and sometimes erroneous numerical treatment. To improve this, we present the main practically relevant segments of the theory with constant reference to physical intuition. We pinpoint the role of the implicit or explicit definition of the bound state (or the binding site) to make a robust link between an experimental measurement and a computational result. We clarify the role of symmetry and discuss cases where symmetry number corrections have been misinterpreted. In particular, we argue that symmetry corrections as classically presented are a source of confusion and could be advantageously replaced by restraint free energy contributions. We establish that contrary to a common intuition, partial or missing sampling of some modes of symmetric bound states does not affect the calculated decoupling free energies. Finally, we review these questions and pitfalls in the context of a few common practical situations: binding to a symmetric receptor (equivalent binding sites), binding of a symmetric ligand (equivalent poses), and formation of a symmetric complex, in the case of homodimerization.

Automated summary

The theory behind computation of absolute binding free energies using explicit-solvent molecular simulations is complex, with counter-intuitive aspects. The role of symmetry and symmetry number corrections are discussed, highlighting potential misconceptions. It is established that partial or missing sampling of symmetric bound states does not affect the calculated decoupling free energies.