4.5 Article

Influence of damaged starch on the properties of rice flour and quality attributes of gluten-free rice bread

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103296

Keywords

Damaged starch; Rice flour; Gluten-free bread

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972005]
  2. Food Nutrition and Functional Component Utilization Research Team from The Agricultural Science and Technol-ogy Innovation Program, CAAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that an increase in damaged starch (DS) content in rice flour leads to a looser hydrated starch structure, decreased crystallinity, and increased hydration properties in cold water. However, when the DS content is lower, rice bread has a softer texture, more porous cell structure, and better appearance.
The effect of damaged starch (DS) content on rice flour properties and rice bread quality was investigated. Five samples containing different amounts of DS (4%, 6%, 8%, 10% and 12%) were employed without changing particle size. With the DS content increased, the fragments stripped from the surface of starch granules increased, the hydrated starch structure became loose, and the crystallinity of rice flour decreased greatly from 26.24% to 22.11%, concurrent with a decrease in the enthalpy (Delta H). Moreover, the increment of DS content caused a gradual increase in hydration properties of rice flour in cold water, an increase in viscoelastic modulus of rice batter and overall decrease in pasting viscosity. Rice bread of good appearance in terms of higher specific volume, stronger network structure, relatively soft bread texture and porous cell structure was obtained in rice flour with less DS content. Finally, it could be concluded that rice flour with 4% and 6% DS content had good flour characteristics and was suitable for gluten-free bread making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available