4.7 Article

Mechanical competition alters the cellular interpretation of an endogenous genetic program

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 220, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202104107

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Molecular Biology Organization
  2. North Carolina State University
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR1756]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

External mechanical stimuli are recognized as determinants of cell behavior, such as in the epithelial folding event during gastrulation in Drosophila. Some cells stretch instead of constrict, despite sharing the same genetic program. Tissue-wide interactions force these stretching cells to expand even with sufficient actomyosin, indicating a nonlinear mechanical property.
The intrinsic genetic program of a cell is not sufficient to explain all of the cell's activities. External mechanical stimuli are increasingly recognized as determinants of cell behavior. In the epithelial folding event that constitutes the beginning of gastrulation in Drosophila, the genetic program of the future mesoderm leads to the establishment of a contractile actomyosin network that triggers apical constriction of cells and thereby tissue folding. However, some cells do not constrict but instead stretch, even though they share the same genetic program as their constricting neighbors. We show here that tissue-wide interactions force these cells to expand even when an otherwise sufficient amount of apical, active actomyosin is present. Models based on contractile forces and linear stress-strain responses do not reproduce experimental observations, but simulations in which cells behave as ductile materials with nonlinear mechanical properties do. Our models show that this behavior is a general emergent property of actomyosin networks in a supracellular context, in accordance with our experimental observations of actin reorganization within stretching cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available