4.8 Article

Steering the selectivity in CO2 reduction on highly active Ru/TiO2 catalysts: Support particle size effects

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 401, Issue -, Pages 160-173

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2021.07.020

Keywords

CO2 methanation; Reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction; Selectivity; O-vacancy; Phase composition; Ru single atoms; Ru/TiO2

Funding

  1. European Union/European Regional Development Fund
  2. DAAD via the RISE program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By investigating oxide-supported Ru catalysts, it was found that the support particle size can influence the selectivity of the catalyst, thus controlling the formation of CO2 reduction reaction products. High-temperature treatment leads to an increase in oxygen vacancies and charge transfer, resulting in alterations to the catalyst's reaction characteristics.
Aiming at a better understanding of the functioning of oxide-supported Ru catalysts in the reduction of CO2, a highly attractive reaction from ecologic reasons, we systematically investigated the influence of the support particle size on the performance of highly active Ru/TiO2 catalysts. Employing mixed rutile-anatase supported catalysts with different TiO2 particle size, but similar Ru particle size and loading, we found that after a reductive high-temperature (HT) treatment their selectivity can be controlled by the TiO2 particle size, from 100% methanation to 100% CO formation. Comprehensive characterization of the catalysts shows that the changes in reaction behavior are paralleled by significant modifications of their structural, chemical and electronic properties. We propose that the change in reaction characteristics is due to a HT-induced increase in O-vacancies and charge transfer to Ru interface atoms, which is more pronounced for high-surface-area catalysts. We see this approach as interesting strategy for tailoring catalyst properties. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available