4.7 Article

Selective separation and concentration of antihypertensive peptides from rapeseed protein hydrolysate by electrodialysis with ultrafiltration membranes

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 197, Issue -, Pages 1008-1014

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.081

Keywords

Rapeseed; Protein hydrolysate; Electrodialysis with ultrafiltration membrane; ACE; Renin; Spontaneously hypertensive rats; Systolic blood pressure

Funding

  1. Natural Science fund for colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province, China [14KJB550003]
  2. priority academic program development of Jiangsu higher education institutions (PAPD)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapeseed protein isolate was subjected to alcalase digestion to obtain a protein hydrolysate that was separated into peptide fractions using electrodialysis with ultrafiltration membrane (EDUF) technology. The EDUF process (6 h duration) led to isolation of three peptide fractions: anionic (recovered in KCl-1 compartment), cationic (recovered in KCl-2 compartment), and those that remained in the feed compartment, which was labeled final rapeseed protein hydrolysate (FRPH). As expected the KCl-1 peptides were enriched in negatively-charged (43.57%) while KCl-2 contained high contents of positively-charged (28.35%) amino acids. All the samples inhibited angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and renin activities in dose-dependent manner with original rapeseed protein hydrolysate having the least ACE-inhibitory IC50 value of 0.0932 +/- 0.0037 mg/mL while FRPH and KCl-2 had least renin-inhibitory IC50 values of 0.47 +/- 0.05 and 0.55 +/- 0.06 mg/mL, respectively. Six hours after oral administration (100 mg/kg body weight) to spontaneously hypertensive rats, the FRPH produced the maximum systolic blood pressure reduction of -51 mmHg. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available